Sorry, how is this different from, say, Barracuda Networks packaging commodity hardware with open source software in nice boxes and selling them for a mint? Where is the outrage coming from on this if he's making this stuff easier to buy and deploy, even if the hardware wasn't developed in-house?
The issue is lying about it, and making other false claims. Such as claiming its "open hardware" when they are relying on closed off the shelf devices.
It also doesn't help that it appears that their default setup is hideously insecure.
