Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a good write-up.

I still think some kind of vanilla ML would suit a lot of people very well.



What do you mean by 'vanilla ML'? I wasn't sure there were any really around... Ocaml has tons of stuff added, and SML also has lots of added extensions.


OCaml would be fine. It's a good language with a very efficient run-time.

I'm arguing that you could throw out most of the advanced features and that would be enough for most people. Its best features are the core ones. That's why I don't really care which specific flavor of ML you pick. Any would be a big win over many languages in wide use today.


That's probably why they said "some vanilla ML" instead of naming an implementation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: