Why would "seeks to improve and optimize the whole cycle of its manufacturing" correspond to "more predictable economy"? Wouldn't "improving and optimizing the whole of manufacturing" cause even more disruptions?
(I'm not arguing against creative disruption. I'm wondering how to square the two concepts.)
Because, at the end, all that brings gradually better products of real value, instead of just trying out completely different ideas which are destined to be the "next big thing" in a chaotic manner, which is what happens to a large extent in the US.
(I'm not arguing against creative disruption. I'm wondering how to square the two concepts.)