Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So Google pushed a new code/technology, supported only by Chrome.

This is not far from the "Google crippling Firefox" point of view.



MSE is actually really cool and makes streaming media over HTTP much more pleasant. I'm not surprised they want to keep the number of codepaths they have to support low. As the GP mentioned, MSE is coming to Firefox soon anyway.


ActiveX is actually really cool and makes [whatever new feature] much more pleasant. I'm not surprised they want to keep the number of codepaths they have to support low. Have we been here before?


The difference is that MSE is a W3 standard, as linked to in the original comment. It's not Google's own proprietary standard.


Ah, that is indeed a fair point; hopefully, Google will switch to capability checking instead of UA sniffing, once this is implemented in FF.


Once they forked Webkit into Blink they took the bad path.


What does Blink have anything to do with this? Blink is completely open source as is Webkit?


Hardly. The "new code/technology" is completely open spec/proposal and its implementation is open source in Chromium. In terms of "Google pushing it", the spec was co-edited by people from Microsoft and Netflix. In terms of "supported only by Chrome", this is strictly Mozilla's fault as there is nothing stopping them from implementing the spec today.

This article and a lot of comments here are really sensationalizing reality. Google needs to serve tons of video data efficiently so they are motivated to push things like MSE. Reading this as "Google crippling Firefox" seems really dramatic and contrived.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: