Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It doesn't strike me as surprising that the sail would take longer than the boat. The skill to make a boat is impressive but the mechanics of getting it done aren't enormous.

Fabrics and sewing, gathering and prepping those materials and the tedious work seems enormous.



I encourage you to watch some videos online of traditional (mostly hand-tools) Shipwrights. Even with the use of a bandsaw to do the rough milling, it is an arduous and lengthy process. Shipwrights also work with some of the longest planks of wood any form of woodworking does. In the days before machines, there would be scores of workers simply preparing the wood and getting it ready for the ship building.

My hunch would be the reason shipbuilding is faster is it is easier to scale to multiple workers, and there are parts you can do in parallel.


The sewing of sail fabric is something different. You need to use heavy duty needle and force it through the fabric. It is somewhat similar I would imagine as dealing with leather.

Wood work deals with big pieces comparatively.


[flagged]


I bet weavers fought like hell against textile industrialization. I'm not an historian, but there must have been such a conflict, and given the scale of it I bet it was bloody. Industrialization freed them from this toil, but at the cost of centralizing the means of production. It is a strange thing, progress.


I'm 90% sure you're telling a subtle joke, but on the off chance you're not "luddite" is worth a Google.


The Luddites were a movement of British textile workers who fought industrialization, at first with sabotage then with open rebellion that was violently put down [1].

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite:

“The Luddites were a secret oath-based organisation of English textile workers in the 19th century, a radical faction which destroyed textile machinery”


> It is a strange thing, progress.

That time is correlated with progress is a very political-liberal idea, to no one’s surprise.


All of human history is the same at its core. Suffering, exploration, profiteering. Yet we have progressed, bit by bit. We have a ways to go, but the arc of history is bending towards less suffering.


Less suffering for some of us, at least in the physical toiling sense and in the short term, but with more humans on the planet than ever before, and so many servings to funnel wealth to a minority, I reckon we’re still collectively suffering quite a bit, with more to come as climate change exacerbates weather extremes and aberrations. And then there’s the suffering of non-human animals. What we’re doing doesn’t feel like progress if I value ecological resilience through diversity, deep connection with the environment and my community, and a history unbroken for thousands of years.


We have exploited our way into climate change, which entails more suffering.


If we manage to exploit our way out of climate change, it will entail more suffering.


“ but the arc of history is bending towards less suffering.”

I don't see it bending towards anything but increasingly vulgar, decadent, forms of violence.


I won't disagree with the things that you see, but would encourage you to resist assuming that is representative of the world at large.


Reminds me of the comparison between computer software and hardware. Hulls are fairly linear. Sails are combinatorial.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: