Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wrote a post about the sale of TechCrunch to AOL a month ago:

http://www.cforcoding.com/2010/10/did-michael-arrington-scre...

In putting together the timeline there was in my opinion a real stink surrounding Arrington's actions. It all just seemed too convenient and coincidental and unsurprisingly to MA's benefit.

I read this post and there is a similar stink. Mike is just too much playing the hapless victim of a tyrannical ogre to be credible.

TC might have done q lot but Jason brought a lot to the table. Compare and contrast with the far less exciting Disrupt conference.

Frankly this sob story has for me made jason's version of events far more credible.

EDIT: sigh, and so the down voting just for my opinion begins...



I suspect the downvotes are more for linking to your blog to get the meat of whatever you're saying.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: