Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've gotten to the point that I will often choose a different library if the one I'm looking at isn't already on github because their interface is so nice for browsing code (not to mention finding useful forks).


Me too. I'll tolerate Google Code or whatever if I know the library is good, but if I'm just googling for stuff (well, duck duck going), I'm a lot more likely to say "eh, let's keep looking" if it's not on github.


I think this is because a project being on github is a huge signal of "I care about my project" which I want if I'm going to be leaning on it for my project.

Like they say, you can always tell if a google code project is active if it says "we've moved to github..."

Github just needs a "Google Groups" without the spam and they're set.


Why is being on github a "huge signal" that they care? They're pushing code into the wild, giving it away for free and actively maintaining it - who cares where they host it if the code is good code?

I'm getting really disturbed at this "if it's not on github it doesn't exist" meme. In the past it was "if it's not on sourceforge it doesn't exist" - what's next?


If the code is good code, then it's good code. You're right about that and I certainly don't go around thinking "If it's not on github, it's bad code."

However, Github makes it very easy to inspect both the source code and the activity around the project. To me, the community that is developing around github is just as important as the code. I don't find that disturbing. I also like what Bitbucket is doing for what it's worth.

Sourceforge, Google Code and a lot of other hosted solutions rely on advertising to make money. They're trying to sell clicks from a click-averse audience and it affects the service. Github is paid for by developers who want great tools. I won't hold it against a development group for picking something other than github but I think developers who want good tools will migrate there. I won't miss sourceforge. If it were merely a fashion trend, I would agree with you but I think github fundamentally changes the way you interact with code.


Sidenote: Google Code doesn't seem to have ads.


You're right, I stand corrected. I was thinking of Google Groups which is related but not the same thing.


Perhaps: "click-averse audience"?


Yes, thank you. Although now I'm trying to figure out what click-adversity would be.


Finger cramps? Finger braces? Carpal tunnel?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: