This one: "Saying hunting is a solution is like saying killing poor people is a solution to poverty"?

Unless people are paying to kill poor people, and that money is in turn used to benefit poor people, it seems like a poor analogy.

Besides, you seem to think it doesn't matter whether 1 animal dying to save 10 (completely made up numbers). That's fine as a personal philosophy I suppose, but be prepared for people to disagree with you.