> First of all no one ever expected machines to beat humans at Imagenet.
I'm not contesting the fact that it's surprising and overall a sign of progress. I'm contesting the claim that it demonstrates "superhuman" performance.
By analogy, a good student at a bad school is "superhuman" because he or she got a good mark in an exam that most other pupils _in that school_ failed. You gotta go a lot further than that before you put on the red cape.
I'm not contesting the fact that it's surprising and overall a sign of progress. I'm contesting the claim that it demonstrates "superhuman" performance.
By analogy, a good student at a bad school is "superhuman" because he or she got a good mark in an exam that most other pupils _in that school_ failed. You gotta go a lot further than that before you put on the red cape.